With the crackdowns on communication and media outlets during the events in Iran, internet communication and social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook have played a central role in the organizing of political action in Iran. Indeed, it is tempting for me to see this sort of organization as the emergence of a new kind of political subject, like what Negri and Hardt call "the multitude." The multitude is an immanent, self-organizing and revolutionary social and political subject. Here's how Hardt and Negri describe the multitude in Empire.
The multitude is bio-political, self-organizing resistance. Social networking sites and the internet have made it possible to organize actual political action not to mention solidarity from the ground up or immanently rather through a centralized, command and control structures. And, that popular movement is now making its way through the social segments and bodies of Iran be they the university students, the middle class, and now even members of the religioius order that sustains the hiearchical and oppressive regime in Iran. But, this is where I wonder if we are really witnessing the emergence of a new political subject like the multitude or merely using new technology to reinistantiate traditional social order? We've seen seemingly pro-democracy social movements end in theocracy there before. Now, you never know if the revolution or change is going to turn out for the best, but at least the fissures in the system and the organization of movements against the theocractic institutions in Iran provide sufficient reason for hope.
Recent Comments